Author: Oleg Ishenko
Take a look at your website. How much of your content might be considered as duplicate by a search engine algorithm? Even though you never copy anyone you can’t answer ‘none’ because someone can be copying you. Duplicate content is one of the biggest issues both for search engines trying to keep their results’ relevancy high, and webmasters trying to avoid search engine penalties.
Penalties for having duplicate content can be really harmful. This is not just a downgrade in rankings but a move to supplementary results which are hardly visible to the most of the web users. Normally it is expected that Google would select one URL over another to display in SERPs, while duplicates could be found in supplemental results. Unfortunately this is not always so.
In the thread “Duplicate content observation” in the WebmasterWorld.com forum you can read about a case when an original high quality and authoritative page was removed from Google’s index together with its duplicates. Considering that this can happen even to the most honest webmaster, one can imagine the amount of attention this issue gets on any SEO forum.
Types of Duplicate Content
Duplicate content has a wider definition than the ‘copy-paste’ plagiarism; it is not just content scrapped from a competitor’s site, a SERP or a RSS feed. Apart from this there are few more aspects that are generally referred to as duplicate content.
Jake Baille from TrueLocal vaguely defines circular navigation as having multiple paths across website. This can be understood as the same content being accessible via different URLs. An example of the circular navigation could be an article that is retrieved by links like
– example.site/articles/1/ ,
Another legitimate use of multiple URLs is forum threads. Each thread can be accessible by a link like myforum.site/index.php/topic.1201.html , and each message within the tread has a URL like myforum.site/index.php/topic.1201.msg.01.html . In the eyes of a search engine all the links lead to different pages with identical content. Solution? Think of a consistent way of linking, or apply robot.txt exclusion rules.
This can also be the case when other people link to you using differently looking URLs. Since these external links are out of your control, you should create a 301 redirect to the canonical URL you choose to be displayed.
Making a printer friendly version is a common practice and it adds value to the visitors. But printer-friendly version is also a prominent example of duplicate content! Fortunately a simple solution like adding a ‘noindex’ meta tag to your print pages solves the issue.
Product pages looking similar are common among online stores. Typically they are created using a single template. Often two different product pages share a description that varies in just few words or numbers, which causes them to be filtered out as duplicate content. This issue has no easy solution. Either you rewrite robot.txt to allow only one product description to be crawled and lose SE traffic to the rest of them, or you roll up your sleeves and add something different to each product page, like testimonials, which is time consuming or nearly impossible depending on the number of product types in your stock.
How Do Duplicate Content Filters Work?
There are several algorithms in data mining aiming to detect similar text passages. The one claimed to be used by search engines is w-shingling. Each document has a unique fingerprint or shinglings – the contiguous subsequences of tokens (blocks of text). The ratio of magnitude of union and intersection of two documents’ shinglings can be used to determine their resemblance. Another algorithm that can be used for duplicates detection is Levenshtein’s distance
It is naturally to expect from a duplicate content filter to be able to discover the origin and rank it higher. The simplest way to detect the origin would be comparing the date of indexing implying that the original source is uploaded and crawled earlier than its copies. But with the advent of the RSS feeds the new content can be distributed instantaneously and this approach is no longer valid.
Concerning the origin’s right to be ranked higher – this is not always implemented. In this article you can read about an experiment of an article distribution. An article was syndicated twice scoring as many as 19000 copies.
After some time Google, Yahoo and MSN have purged their indices leaving just few of the duplicates. MSN’s filter managed not only to discover the origin but also put it to the top of the search results. Yahoo has also discovered the origin, but in the results page to the title of the article, the origin’s position fluctuated obviously responding to the way Yahoo counts relevancy and authority.
To the tester’s amusement Google’s refined index did not include the original at all! Evidently Google featured only those pages with copies of the same article which it considered relevant and authoritative with no regard to the original source of the content! I’ve already mentioned a thread where a similar problem is discussed. The both stories took place in 2005 and early 2006 and so far I found no evidence that this issue is resolved.
Originally published at “Duplicate Content: What You Ought to Know About“.
About the Author:
Oleg Ishenko, SEOResearcher.com. For more information on search engine optimization and marketing check out our SEO Training Materials website.[divider]